Formula 20 is an effort to run Control on a thought level. It is relatively experimental.

It is for cases that have much alter-is as represented by inability to duplicate commands. Also for cases that have unsteady engram banks that shift.

The commands are:

“Who has failed to control you?”

“Who have you failed to control?”

“What has failed to control you?”

“What have you failed to control?”

Here is a new command for Communication on the Pre-Hav Scale.

and

It comes as a surprise to me to find a new Comm process after Comm being in prominence 11 years, but that’s what’s happened. Also this process is foreshadowed by the Code of Honor.

“Who have you helped?”

It replaces the Pre-Hav Command in HCO Bulletin of February 2, 1961 (dated March 9, 1961 from Saint Hill).

“Who has helped you?”

The basic command from which the others are derived is:

“Recall not wanting to communicate.”

The full commands that can be run in sequence are:

“Recall not wanting to communicate.”

“Recall another not wanting to communicate.”

“Recall not wanting another to communicate.”

“Recall another not wanting you to communicate.”

“Recall another not wanting others to communicate.”

“Recall a communication.”

“Recall a no-communication.”

“Recall a communication.”

“Recall a no-communication.”

“Recall a communication.”

“Recall a no-communication.”

The command structure, having so many possibilities, has only been partially sorted out. The first five commands of the above or the last six commands of the above or all of the above may be run. The last six, of course, handle loss incidents.

It just may be that the first line as a process underlies all withholds and gives later withholds power. This may then, just as a process, considerably ease the task set in getting off withholds on secretive cases.

Using all the first five lines in sequence is probably easiest on the pc, afterwards flattening the last six commands.